GN BAKKEN

Deegkar op wielen 125 lit.

756,00
SKU: TRX15/B
mm (B x D x H) : 395 x 610 x 785

Deegkar op wielen 150 lit.

813,00
SKU: TRX15/MX
mm (B x D x H) : 395 x 660 x 785

Dresseerwagen in R.V.S., 3x GN 1/1, ondertablet

777,00
SKU: CDS-311
mm (B x D x H) : 1170 x 630 x 940

Serveerwagen – 2 niveaus

486,00
SKU: CR2/100B
mm (B x D x H) : 1000 x 500 x 960

Serveerwagen – 2 niveaus

444,00
SKU: CR2/80B
mm (B x D x H) : 800 x 500 x 960

Serveerwagen 2 niveau’s

756,00
SKU: CS2/100S
mm (B x D x H) : 1090 x 590 x 915

Serveerwagen 3 niveaus

923,00
SKU: CS3/100S
mm (B x D x H) : 1090 x 590 x 915

Serveerwagen in R.V.S., 3x GN 1/1 + 1 niveau

618,00
SKU: CP2/311
mm (B x D x H) : 1120 x 620 x 1120

Serveerwagen in R.V.S., 3x GN 1/1 + 2 niveau’s

825,00
SKU: CP3/311
mm (B x D x H) : 1120 x 620 x 1120

Serveerwagen RVS 3 niveau’s

605,00
SKU: CR3/100B
mm (B x D x H) : 1000 x 500 x 960

Silowagen voor 20x GN 1/1, tussenruimte 75 mm

620,00
SKU: CG120/B
mm (B x D x H) : 383 x 555 x 1838

Silowagen voor 20x GN 2/1, tussenruimte 75 mm

720,00
SKU: CG220/B
mm (B x D x H) : 588 x 675 x 1838

Silowagen voor 7xGN 1/1, tussenruimte 75 mm, met top in R.V.S.

581,00
SKU: CG17/B
mm (B x D x H) : 360 x 680 x 860

Silowagen voor recipiënten 20x 600×400 mm, tussenruimte 75 mm

586,00
SKU: CP120/B
mm (B x D x H) : 458 x 625 x 1838

Silowagen, R.V.S. schalen, 14x 600×400 mm, 85 mm

734,00
SKU: EPZ/14
mm (B x D x H) : 720 x 520 x 1630

Silowagen, R.V.S. schalen, 8x 600×400 mm, 75 mm, R.V.S. bovenblad

612,00
SKU: EPZ/8X
mm (B x D x H) : 650 x 520 x 860

Transportwagen

741,00
SKU: CPP/200
mm (B x D x H) : 840 x 480 x 900

Transportwagen

483,00
SKU: CTP/R
mm (B x D x H) : 940 x 570 x 1000

Transportwagen voor manden

282,00
SKU: CAR-1M/B
mm (B x D x H) : 590 x 590 x 800

Universele silowagen 12 niveaus

950,00
SKU: CV12/12
mm (B x D x H) : 520 x 600 x 1830

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.