Shop

Bestekmand – Rilsan

155,00
SKU: DCP-RZ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 120

Bestekrecipient in polypropyleen

68,00
SKU: DCP
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 110

Generieke mand – Rilsan

140,00
SKU: DCB-RZ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 150

Korf 16 borden Ø 240 mm – polypropyleen x WR-LV50…C

46,00
SKU: DPP-16/WR
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 100

Korf 18 borden Ø 240 mm – polypropyleen

69,00
SKU: DPP-18
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 110

Mand 15 borden Ø 280 mm – polypropileen

96,00
SKU: DPP-15
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 130

Mand 16 glazen Ø 113 mm, h130, Polyprop.

143,00
SKU: DB116
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 170

Mand 16 glazen Ø 113 mm, h165, Polyp.

188,00
SKU: DB216/FQ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 210

Mand 16 glazen Ø 113 mm, h165, Polyprop.

174,00
SKU: DB216
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 210

Mand 16 glazen Ø 113 mm, h210 “gebogen”, Polyp.

225,00
SKU: DB316/FQ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 250

Mand 16 glazen Ø 113 mm, h210, Polyp.

204,00
SKU: DB316
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 250

Mand 18 borden Ø 240 mm – Rilsan

97,00
SKU: DRR-18/RZ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 150

Mand 25 glazen Ø 90 mm, h130, Polyprop.

151,00
SKU: DB125
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 170

Mand 25 glazen Ø 90 mm, h165 “gebogen”, Polyp.

204,00
SKU: DB225/FQ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 210

Mand 25 glazen Ø 90 mm, h210 “gebogen”, Polyp.

238,00
SKU: DB325/FQ
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 250

Mand 25 glazen Ø 90 mm, h210, Polyp.

217,00
SKU: DB325
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 250

Mand 36 glazen Ø 73 mm, h130 mm, Polyprop.

152,00
SKU: DB136
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 170

Mand 36 glazen Ø 73 mm, h165, Polyprop.

194,00
SKU: DB236
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 210

Mand 36 glazen Ø 73 mm, h210, Polyp.

230,00
SKU: DB336
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 250

Mand 49 glazen Ø 63 mm, h130 mm, Polyprop.

162,00
SKU: DB149
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 500 x 170

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.