Shop

Gekoelde vleesmolen N°22, monoblok in R.V.S.

4.323,00
SKU: TC22/ICE
mm (B x D x H) : 310 x 350 x 615 - kW (elec) : 1.1

Gekoelde vleesmolen N°32, monoblok in R.V.S.

4.171,00
SKU: TB32/ICE-2EME
mm (B x D x H) : 355 x 500 x 690 - kW (elec) : 1.84

Gekoelde vleesmolen N°32, monoblok in R.V.S.

5.444,00
SKU: TB32/ICE
mm (B x D x H) : 355 x 500 x 690 - kW (elec) : 1.84

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 22, tafelmodel, Ø 4,5 mm, 200 kg/h

2.500,00
SKU: TCX22/NC
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 415 x 432/568 - kW (elec) : 1.47

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 22, tafelmodel, Ø 4,5 mm, 200 kg/h

3.372,00
SKU: TCX32/ND
mm (B x D x H) : 610 x 479 x 462/568 - kW (elec) : 2.2

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 22, tafelmodel, Ø 4,5 mm, 350 kg/h

3.625,00
SKU: TGD22/AT-N
mm (B x D x H) : 512 x 390 x 531 - kW (elec) : 1.1

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 22, tafelmodel, Ø 6 mm, 500kg/h

4.800,00
SKU: TGD32/BT-N
mm (B x D x H) : 637 x 455 x 551 - kW (elec) : 2.2

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 32, Ø 4.5 mm, 700 kg/h, op wielen

9.270,00
SKU: TTGD-32/CB-N
mm (B x D x H) : 564 x 911 x 1237 - kW (elec) : 2.94 - Voltage : 400-230/3N 50Hz

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 32, Ø 6 mm, 600 kg/h, onderstel op wielen

7.698,00
SKU: TMGD-32/CA
mm (B x D x H) : 535 x 505 x 1026 - kW (elec) : 2.2

Hakmolen in R.V.S. N° 42, Ø 4.5 mm, 800/1000 kg/h, op wielen

10.107,00
SKU: TTGD-42/DC-N
mm (B x D x H) : 564 x 973 x 1241 - kW (elec) : 3.68 - Voltage : 400-230/3N 50Hz

Vleesmolen “MAXI” n° 32

3.773,00
SKU: TCM-32
mm (B x D x H) : 475 x 300 x 560 - kW (elec) : 2.2

Vleesmolen kader n° 32 (groep in R.V.S.)

3.002,00
SKU: TI32/SX
mm (B x D x H) : 500 x 225 x 510 - kW (elec) : 1.5

Vleesmolen n°12. (group in R.V.S.)

1.344,00
SKU: TS12/X
mm (B x D x H) : 380 x 220 x 430 - kW (elec) : 0.8

Vleesmolen n°22 (group volledig in RVS)

1.660,00
SKU: TS22/X
mm (B x D x H) : 450 x 220 x 400 - kW (elec) : 1.1

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.