Shop

Mand voor glazen 400x400mm – polypropyleen

93,00
SKU: DLBQ/39
mm (B x D x H) : 390 x 390 x 150

Mand voor glazen in polypropyleen

70,00
SKU: DGR-35
mm (B x D x H) : 350 x 350 x 120

Mand voor glazen Ø 85 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan

106,00
SKU: DVR-43/85
mm (B x D x H) : 390 x 390 x 170

Mand voor glazen Ø110 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan

106,00
SKU: DVR-43/110
mm (B x D x H) : 373 x 380 x 170

Mand voor glazen Ø110 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan

110,00
SKU: DVR-44/110
mm (B x D x H) : 400 x 400 x 170

Mand voor glazen Ø85 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan

110,00
SKU: DVR-44/85
mm (B x D x H) : 400 x 400 x 170

Mand voor glazen, 350×350 mm – Rilsan

70,00
SKU: DGR-35RZ
mm (B x D x H) : 350 x 350 x 150

Mand voor glazen, 400×400 mm – polypropyleen

93,00
SKU: DLBQ
mm (B x D x H) : 400 x 400 x 150

Mand voor glazen, 400×400 mm – Rilsan

77,00
SKU: DLBQ/39RZ
mm (B x D x H) : 390 x 390 x 150

Mand voor glazen, 400×400 mm – Rilsan

90,00
SKU: DLBQ/RZ
mm (B x D x H) : 400 x 400 x 150

Mand voor ronde glazen Ø 350 mm – Rilsan

64,00
SKU: DGR/R35
mm (B x D x H) : 350 x 350 x 110

Ronde mand voor glazen Ø 400 mm – Polypropyleen

93,00
SKU: DLBQ/R40
mm (B x D x H) : 400 x 400 x 180

Ronde mand voor glazen Ø400 mm – Rilsan

221,00
SKU: DLBQ/R39
mm (B x D x H) : 390 x 390 x 165

Steun rooster voor ronde mand Ø 350 mm

36,00
SKU: DGR/G35-6
mm (B x D x H) : 360 x 360 x 20

Steun voor 8 borden Ø240 mm, mand 400×400 mm

31,00
SKU: DIP-7A/N
mm (B x D x H) : 150 x 370 x 80

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.