Productcategorieën
- Afzuiging & Ventilatie
- Cafetaria & Bar
- Combistomers & Ovens
- Doner
- Geen categorie
- Horeca meubilair
- Keuken apperatuur
- Broodroosters
- Contact grill (panini machines)
- Cutter
- Groenten snijder
- Hamburger perser
- Hot Dog verwarmer
- Ijsmachines
- Messensterilisators
- Mosselenwasser
- Mozzarella rasp machine
- Salamander
- Staafmixers
- Tosti Apparatuur
- Vacuummachine
- Verpakkingsfolie
- Vleesmolens
- Wafel & pannenkoek machines
- Weegschalen
- Worstenopvuller
- Klein materiaal
- Koelen & Vriezen
- Koken en bakken
- Pizzeria
- RVS Meubilair & Spoeltafels
- Vaatwassers
- Vitrines & Service Line
Familie
- Generiek 3
- Glazenwasmachine 15
- Glazenwasmachines & vaatwasmachines 4
- Lave-batteries 9
- Lave-vaiselles à capot 14
- Réfrigérés 2 tiroirs 3
- Réfrigérés 2x 2 tiroirs 1
- Réfrigérés 2x 3 tiroirs 1
- Réfrigérés 2x 4 tiroirs 1
- Réfrigérés 3 tiroirs 2
- Réfrigérés 4 tiroirs 1
- Vaatwasmach. kap CROSSOVER 4
- Vaatwasmachines 32
- Vaatwasmachines - CROSSOVER 4
- Vriezen 2 laden 1
- Vriezen 3 laden 1
Subfamilie
Lines
Mand 36 glazen Ø 73 mm, h130 mm, Polyprop.
Mand 36 glazen Ø 73 mm, h165, Polyprop.
Mand 36 glazen Ø 73 mm, h210, Polyp.
Mand 49 glazen Ø 63 mm, h130 mm, Polyprop.
Mand 49 glazen Ø 63 mm, h165, Polyprop.
Mand 49 glazen Ø 63 mm, h210, Polyp.
Mand 9 pizzaborden Ø 380 mm – polypropyleen
Mand dienbladen 530 mm in polypropyleen
Mand thermische dienbladen in polypropyleen
Mand voor 12 borden – 450x450mm – polypropyleen
Mand voor glazen – 450x450mm – polypropyleen
Mand voor glazen 400x400mm – polypropyleen
Mand voor glazen 450×450 mm – Rilsan.
Mand voor glazen in polypropyleen
Mand voor glazen Ø 110 mm, 500x500mm RILSAN
Mand voor glazen Ø 80 mm, 500x500mm RILSAN
Mand voor glazen Ø 85 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan
Mand voor glazen Ø110 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan
Mand voor glazen Ø110 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan
Mand voor glazen Ø85 mm, 400×400 mm Rilsan
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.